9 reasons why Google and Apple should be worried

For the last year we’ve heard rumors of how both Apple and Google were getting close to releasing music locker services that allow music listeners to upload their music collection to the cloud giving them the ability to listen to their music everywhere. So it was a big surprise when the first major Internet player to launch a music locker service wasn’t Google or Apple, but instead was Amazon.  Last week, with little fanfare, Amazon released its Amazon Cloud Drive, a cloud-based music locker that includes the Amazon Cloud Player allowing people to listen to their music anywhere.  Amazon’s entry into the music locker is a big deal and should be particularly worrisome for Google and Apple.  Amazon brings some special sauce to the music locker world that will make them a formidable competitor:

  1. Amazon can keep a secret – For the last year, we’ve heard much about the rumored Google and Apple locker services, but not a peep about the Amazon service.  The first time people heard about the Amazon Locker service was when Amazon announced it on its front page.  It says a lot about a large organization that can launch a major new product without rumors circulating in the industry.
  2. Amazon isn’t afraid to say “F*ck You” to the labels.  While Apple and Google are negotiating licensing rights for the locker service, Amazon just went ahead and released their locker without any special music license.  Amazon Director of Music Craig Pape told Billboard.biz “We don’t believe we need licenses to store the customers’ files. We look at it the same way as if someone bought an external hard drive and copy files on there for backup.”
  3. Amazon knows how to do the ‘cloud thing’ – Amazon has been leading the pack in cloud computing for years.  They know how to build reliable, cost-effective cloud-based solutions, they’ve been doing it longer than anyone. Thousands of applications  have been deployed in the Amazon cloud from big corporations to successful startups like  dropbox. Compare to Apple’s track record for MobileMe.  Of course Google knows how to do this stuff too, but they haven’t been immune to problems.
  4. Amazon knows about discovery Amazon’s focus on discovery makes them a much better online bookstore than any other bookstore.  They use all sorts of ways to connect a reader with a book.  Collaborative filtering, book reviews, customer lists,  content search,  best seller lists , special deals.  These techniques help get their readers deep into the long tail of books.  Discovery is in Amazon’s genes.   Contrast that to how Youtube helps you find videos, or how well Apple’s Genius helps you find music.  Currently Amazon is providing no discovery tools yet with the Amazon Cloud Music Player, but you can bet that they will be adding these features soon.
  5. Amazon understands the importance of metadata – Amazon has always placed a premium on collecting high quality metadata about their media.  That’s why they bought IMDB, and created SoundUnwound. That’s why when I uploaded 700 albums to the Amazon cloud,  Amazon found album art and metadata for every single one of them. Compare that to iTunes which after nearly 10 years, still can’t seem to find album art for 90% of my music collection.
  6. Amazon does APIs – this is what I’m most excited about.  Imagine if and when Amazon releases the Amazon Cloud Music API that lets a developer build applications around the content stored in a music locker.  This will open the door for a myriad of applications from music visualizers, playlisting engines, event recommenders, and taste sharing, on our phones, on our set top boxes, on our computers..   Amazon has lead the way in making everything they do available via APIs. When they release the Amazon Cloud Music API, I think we’ll see a new level of creativity around music exploration, discovery, organization and listening.
  7. Amazon has done this before – The Kindle platform has already allowed you to do for books what the Amazon music locker does for music.  You can buy content in the Amazon store, keep it in your locker and consume it on any device.  This is not new tech for Amazon, they’ve been doing this for years already.
  8. Amazon has lots of customers – Last month Steve said he thought that Apple had more customer accounts than Amazon.  Of course that was just a guess and Steve is not impartial. Amazon doesn’t say how many customer accounts they have, but we know its a lot.   Amazon is clever in how they use the Music Locker to promote music purchases. Music you purchase from Amazon is stored for free in your locker, and when you buy an album your locker storage gets upgraded to 20GB for free.
  9. Amazon seems to care – Google has accidentally  built the largest music destination on the Internet, but try to use YouTube to as a place to go and find music and you are faced with the challenge of separating the good music from the many covers, remixes, parodies and just plain crap that seem to fill the channel.  iTunes has gone from a pretty good way to play music to becoming something that I only use to sync new content to my phone. It is bloated, slow and painful to use.  In the ten years that Apple has been king of the digital music hill they’ve done little to help improve the music listening experience. Apple has moved on to video and Apps. Music is just another feature.   Contrast that with what Amazon has done with the Kindle – they’ve made a device that arguably improves the reading experience. They chose eInk over color display, they keep the non-reading features to a minimum, they give a reader great discovery tools like the ability to sample the first few chapters of any book.  I’m hopeful that Amazon will apply their same since of care for books to the world of music.

Amazon’s music locker is not perfect by any means. There’s no iPhone app. The storage is too expensive, there are no discovery or automatic playlisting features in the player.  But what they’ve built is solid and usable.  I’m also not bullish on music lockers.  I’d rather pay $10 bucks a month to listen to any of 5 million tracks than to buy tracks at a dollar each.  But I’m glad to see Amazon position itself so aggressively in this space.  The competition between Google, Apple and Amazon will lead to a better music experience for us all.

  1. #1 by jeremy on April 4, 2011 - 9:20 am

    Speaking of Apple letting iTunes/discovery languish: Back in 2004, some London folks and I tried to get Apple interested in ISMIR 2005. The lower level people got it. The higher level people said “pass”.

  2. #2 by Daniel on April 4, 2011 - 9:58 am

    i’m not sure apple or google have anything to worry about yet (the cloud player experience is **rough**) but a few more thoughts:

    * the kindle android is coming and this will be their music store (probably subsidized for lockin)

    * amazon can easily fight google/apple in the ever decreasing streaming/storage costs

    * amazon has nothing to loose here since they aren’t exactly killing it in the digital music space (when compared to the % they dominate other key markets they operate in) – it’s a great position to be coming from because they can act very disruptive

    * this fragments the consumer experience on android making it slightly more competitive for google (ie they really need to bring their game – we want free, subsidized music and super cheap streaming/storage)

    * it’s likely amazon could build/partner/buy a service like soundcloud to offer a new distribution platform

    * a bit murky on this one but cloudplayer could become a “normalizer” for sharing digital music (keep your metadata/info there and use something like echonest to determine legal digital rights playback wherever) ex: joe plays a track shares it to facebook his friend matt clicks on it amazon determines matt has an account on rdio and proposes playing the track back there

    interesting note: if cloudplayer is determined a failure the team/project might be able to be spun into a new dropbox like service – so a decent amount of the tech/team could be re-usable.

    my prediction is amazon will end up buying http://soundtracking.com before the end of the year. wouldn’t be shocked if they snapped up http://soundcloud.com too. if they do these things we’ll know they are serious.

  3. #3 by Anh-Tuan on April 5, 2011 - 5:48 am

    One reason why Amazon should be worried: Spotify!

  4. #4 by kikito on April 5, 2011 - 10:18 am

    “Amazon Cloud Drive” should be a link to https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/learnmore

    • #5 by Paul on April 5, 2011 - 10:24 am

      good idea kikito

  5. #6 by Omiod on April 5, 2011 - 11:10 am

    The cloud player works only in the USA, they forgot the remaining 95%

  6. #7 by Andy on April 5, 2011 - 9:58 pm

    Well, I’ve been using Audiogalaxy (www.audiogalaxy.com) and it’s easily better than Amazon Cloud Player on my Moto Droid. I get access to my 140GB of music, and it’s never once skipped on me. With ACP, I need to wait for the song to download/buffer but I’ve never had to wait with Audiogalaxy. At work, I just use their website.

  7. #8 by oscil8 on April 8, 2011 - 6:05 am

    Amazon only operates in 9 countries. Contrast this with over 100 for Apple and 70 odd countries for Google’s international services such as News. So that’s at least 60 reasons why they have nothing to worry about.

  8. #9 by tv14 on April 13, 2011 - 8:41 am

    “amazon can easily fight google/apple in the ever decreasing streaming/storage costs” I share with your opinion.

  9. #10 by Ty on May 10, 2011 - 8:34 pm

    I am very glad to learn of this technology. I had no clue that clouds existed for music. As a music teacher at several buildings, it will be a great tool. Will the licensing rights be needed? Apple and Google must be negotiating licensing rights for a reason. Have there been any law suits against other music clouds like audiogalaxy?

%d bloggers like this: