, TechCrunch and the RIAA

There was a bit of a kerfuffle on Friday evening when TechCrunch posted a story headlined: Did Just Hand Over User Listening Data To the RIAA? – where they “reported” on a rumor that had handed over a bunch of data  to the RIAA so the RIAA could track down pirates of the new U2 album .  The answer to the headline question is an unequivocal  “no!”.  The folks at would never do that, and they have denied it in no uncertain terms.

But still two days later, the headline stands on the front page of TechCrunch, and only readers who venture past the fold will see mention that has denied the rumor.  Why doesn’t TechCrunch change the headline or post prominently in the first paragraph that has denied it the rumor?   Why is TechCrunch posting a story based on a single source?  No doubt, such headlines bring lots of links and readers to TechCrunch, but it is not responsible journalism. Reporting on rumor, gossip and subsequently failing to correct the false reporting is just bad journalism.

  1. #1 by Andy Baio on February 22, 2009 - 11:35 am

    “I don’t claim to be a journalist, and I’m never neutral.” — Michael Arrington

    I think that attitude extends to the some of the other authors, too.

  2. #2 by Cousin Chris on February 23, 2009 - 1:32 pm

    Great point. Totally irresponsible journalism. And yet took me reading your post to be reminded of that, just so used to such behavior to get clicks.

%d bloggers like this: