<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Name Dropper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/</link>
	<description>a blog about music technology by Paul Lamere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Länksprutning &#8211; 10 August 2010 &#8211; Månhus</title>
		<link>http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/#comment-8481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Länksprutning &#8211; 10 August 2010 &#8211; Månhus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmachinery.com/?p=2447#comment-8481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Name Dropper [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Name Dropper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zazi</title>
		<link>http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/#comment-7885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zazi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmachinery.com/?p=2447#comment-7885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

what about using this game for spelling correction? That means including wrong and right spellings of music artists and score these ones.
Furthermore, I don&#039;t really think that the classic composer are that difficult (people often know these names from the music class in school). My problem was artists from music genres I&#039;m not familar with. That means, it was in general to difficult for me.

Cheers,

zazi]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>what about using this game for spelling correction? That means including wrong and right spellings of music artists and score these ones.<br />
Furthermore, I don&#8217;t really think that the classic composer are that difficult (people often know these names from the music class in school). My problem was artists from music genres I&#8217;m not familar with. That means, it was in general to difficult for me.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>zazi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Logan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmachinery.com/?p=2447#comment-7881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...we have a Q/A process where a person knowledgeable in music ranks our familiarity score by scanning through a list of artists ordered in descending familiarity until they start finding artists that they don’t recognize.  The further they get into the list, the better the list is.&quot;

Sounds a lot like a ROC score, but not quite as accurate.  Instead of just stopping the first time they see an artist they don&#039;t know, wouldn&#039;t it better (and not that much more time consuming) to have them keep going while marking the ones they don&#039;t know.  Once they go say 10 or 20 unknown artists in a row they can stop with the assumption that the rest are unknown, and you can calculate a fairly accurate ROC score.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;we have a Q/A process where a person knowledgeable in music ranks our familiarity score by scanning through a list of artists ordered in descending familiarity until they start finding artists that they don’t recognize.  The further they get into the list, the better the list is.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds a lot like a ROC score, but not quite as accurate.  Instead of just stopping the first time they see an artist they don&#8217;t know, wouldn&#8217;t it better (and not that much more time consuming) to have them keep going while marking the ones they don&#8217;t know.  Once they go say 10 or 20 unknown artists in a row they can stop with the assumption that the rest are unknown, and you can calculate a fairly accurate ROC score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/#comment-6217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmachinery.com/?p=2447#comment-6217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan - yes - there&#039;s a penalty if you take too long to answer. That&#039;s to prevent people from relying on Wikipedia to boost their scores.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan &#8211; yes &#8211; there&#8217;s a penalty if you take too long to answer. That&#8217;s to prevent people from relying on Wikipedia to boost their scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Geiser</title>
		<link>http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/#comment-6213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Geiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmachinery.com/?p=2447#comment-6213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was playing this in between activities at work and I noticed when I answered one question right my score went down.  It did take me a particularly long time to answer.  Is the score you get for a correct answer based on some sort of time factor as well?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was playing this in between activities at work and I noticed when I answered one question right my score went down.  It did take me a particularly long time to answer.  Is the score you get for a correct answer based on some sort of time factor as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alsotop</title>
		<link>http://musicmachinery.com/2010/07/10/the-name-dropper/#comment-6167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alsotop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmachinery.com/?p=2447#comment-6167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it was obvious your name generator never creates 1 word artist names, which meant ruling out some possible options when I got to the point where I had to guess...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was obvious your name generator never creates 1 word artist names, which meant ruling out some possible options when I got to the point where I had to guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

