Comments on: The SQL Join is destroying music

By: Månhus » Länksprutning – 20 November 2009

Månhus » Länksprutning – 20 November 2009 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:00:42 +0000

[...] The SQL Join is destroying music [...]

By: brian

brian — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:02:26 +0000

we of course don’t know for sure about AMG & MGP, but we just extrapolate from various pieces of data we found and hear over the years… The point i said aloud (barely) was that it just shows the three different approaches and why EN’s is somewhat more efficient.. i don’t think anyone can argue that the EN analyzer/crawlers are slower or more expensive than a MGP or AMG editor.

there should be a latent disclaimer across the whole talk that it is not an academic presentation. The EN data is correct to the best of my knowledge, however :)

By: Zac

Zac — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:53:50 +0000

Very fun presentation.

Interested to know where Brian got the stats about the “Known Artists” and “Cost to Understand One Album” on slide 72.

By: brian

brian — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:50:11 +0000

yes, it is very exciting!! There was even a more exciting part relating to that new feature that was cut from the talk at the last minute due to lack of willing perfomer

ps, anyone that does genre ID that wants to write me hate mail, please be aware that I have once done genre ID and I understand the academic interest in predicting a known label on perpendicular form of data. I think mnb will post my actual talk, which will make me sound less like a Strange Person with Ideas (maybe)

By: lfranchi

lfranchi — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:46:47 +0000

slide 110 makes me excited

“we will soon make all of our acoustic data available for searching and browsing”

can’t wait to build some great features into a certain desktop media player :)